Pollination potential of male bumble bees (Bombus impatiens): movement patterns and pollen-transfer efficiency

Authors

  • Katherine Ostevik
  • Jessamyn Manson
  • James Thomson

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26786/1920-7603(2010)3

Keywords:

<i>Bombus impatiens</i>, foraging efficiency, geitonogamy, sexually dimorphic behaviour

Abstract

Many plant species rely on female bumble bee workers for pollen transfer. However, male bumble bees, which differ both behaviourally and morphologically from female workers, also visit many species of flowering plants and may transfer pollen differently. Males can outnumber workers on some plants, particularly those that flower late in the season. In laboratory experiments, we compared the movement patterns of male bees and female workers on an artificial flower array. We also compared the pollen transfer efficiency of males and workers foraging on Brassica rapa flowers. Males travelled between patches of flowers more often than workers, which may be an effective method for reducing geitonogamy in plants. Males also had lower foraging rates, longer flower handling time, and transferred more pollen from one B. rapa flower to the next than workers did. These caste-based differences in pollinating behaviour suggest that, under certain circumstances and on a per-visit basis, male bumble bees may be better pollen vectors than female foragers. Furthermore, our results emphasize the need to avoid species-wide generalizations of pollinator effectiveness.

References

Ackerman JD, Mesler MR, Lu KL, Montalvo AM (1982) Food-foraging behavior of male Euglossini (Hymenoptera, Apidae) - Vagabonds or trapliners. Biotropica 14: 241-248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2388080

Ayasse M, Schiestl FP, Paulus HF, Lofstedt C, Hansson B, Ibarra F, Francke W (2000) Evolution of reproductive strategies in the sexually deceptive orchid Ophrys sphegodes : How does flower-specific variation of odor signals influence reproductive success? Evolution 54: 1995-2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb01243.x

Baer B, Schmid-Hempel P (2006) Phenotypic variation in male and worker encapsulation response in the bumblebee Bombus terrestris . Ecological Entomology 31: 591-596. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.2006.00825.x

Bourke A (1997) Sex ratios in bumble bees. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 352: 1921-1933. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1997.0179

Church D, Plowright C, Loyer D (2001) Discriminations of color and pattern on artificial flowers by male and female bumble bees, Bombus impatiens (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Great Lakes Entomologist 34: 85-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22543/0090-0222.2052

Free JB (1982) Bees and Mankinds. George Allen and Unwin, London.

Gegear RJ, Manson JS, Thomson JD (2007) Ecological context influences pollinator deterrence by alkaloids in floral nectar. Ecology Letters 10: 375-382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01027.x

Hauser TP, Loeschcke V (1994) Inbreeding depression and mating-distance dependent offspring fitness in large and small populations of Lychnis-Flos-Cuculi (Caryophyllaceae). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 7: 609-622. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.1994.7050609.x

Ivey CT, Martinez P, Wyatt R (2003) Variation in pollinator effectiveness in swamp milkweed, Asclepias incarnata (Apocynaceae). American Journal of Botany 90: 214-225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.90.2.214

Jennersten O, Morse DH, O’Neil P (1991) Movements of male and worker bumblebees on and between flowers. Oikos 62: 319-324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3545496

de Jong TJ, Waser NM, Klinkhamer PGL (1993) Geitonogamy: The neglected side of selfing. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8: 321-325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(93)90239-L

Kearns CA, Thomson JD (2001) The Natural History of Bumblebees. Bolder, Colorado: University Press of Colorado.

Kraus FB, Wolf S, Moritz RFA (2009) Male flight distance and population substructure in the bumblebee Bombus terrestris . Journal of Animal Ecology 78: 247-252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01479.x

Mayfield MM, Waser NM, Price MV (2001) Exploring the ‘most effective pollinator principle’ with complex flowers: Bumblebees and Ipomopsis aggregata . Annals of Botany 88: 591-596. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.2001.1500

Mosquin T (1971) Competition for pollinators as a stimulus for the evolution of flowering time. Oikos 22: 398-402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3543864

Muchhala N, Thomson JD (2010) Fur versus feathers: Pollen delivery by bats and hummingbirds and consequences for pollen production. The American Naturalist 175: 717-726. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/652473

Ne'eman G, Shavit O, Shaltiel L, Shmida A (2006) Foraging by male and female solitary bees with implications for pollination. Journal of Insect Behavior 19: 383-401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-006-9030-7

Pyke, G (1978) Optimal foraging: movement patterns of bumblebees between inflorescences. Theoretical Population Biology 13: 72-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-5809(78)90036-9

R Development Core Team (2009). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org.

Spaethe J, Moser WH, Paulus HF (2007) Increase of pollinator attraction by means of a visual signal in the sexually deceptive orchid, Ophrys heldreichii (Orchidaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 264: 31-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-006-0503-0

Stebbins G (1970) Adaptive radiation of reproductive characteristics in angiosperms, I: pollination mechanisms. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1: 307-326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.01.110170.001515

Thomson JD (1986) Pollen transport and deposition by bumble bees in Erythronium - Influences of floral nectar and bee grooming. Journal of Ecology 74: 329-341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2260258

Thomson JD, Goodell K (2001) Pollen removal and deposition by honeybee and bumblebee visitors to apple and almond flowers. Journal of Applied Ecology 38: 1032-1044. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00657.x

Thomson JD, Thomson BA (1992) Pollen presentation and viability schedules in animal-pollinated plants: consequences for reproductive success. Pp. 1-24 in: Ecology and Evolution of Plant Reproduction: New Approaches, ed. R. Wyatt. Chapman and Hall, New York.

Williams NH, Dodson CH (1972) Selective attraction of male Euglossine bees to orchid floral fragrances and its importance in long-distance pollen flow. Evolution 26: 84-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1972.tb00176.x

Willmer PG, Bataw AAM, Hughes JP (1994) The superiority of bumblebees to honeybees as pollinators – Insect visits to raspberry flowers. Ecological Entomology 19: 271-284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.1994.tb00419.x

Downloads

Published

2010-11-28

How to Cite

Ostevik, K., Manson, J., & Thomson, J. (2010). Pollination potential of male bumble bees (Bombus impatiens): movement patterns and pollen-transfer efficiency. Journal of Pollination Ecology, 2, 21–26. https://doi.org/10.26786/1920-7603(2010)3

Issue

Section

Articles