Foraging dynamics and pollination efficiency of Apis mellifera and Xylocopa olivacea on Luffa aegyptiaca Mill (Cucurbitaceae) in southern Ghana

Ben Mensah; Andreas Kudom

doi:10.26786/1920-7603(2011)6

Authors

Ben Mensah
Andreas Kudom

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26786/1920-7603(2011)6

Keywords:

nectar concentration, nectar energetics, foraging dynamics, cucurbit plants

Abstract

As a result of different levels of pollination efficiency of pollinators, knowledge on appropriate pollinators of a plant has become important, especially in the management and conservation of both the pollinators and the plants. In this study, the pollination efficiency of Apis mellifera and Xylocopa olivacea, important pollinators of Luffa aegyptiaca, were assessed in the southern coastal part of Ghana from June 2009 to September 2010. Pollination efficiency of A. mellifera and X. olivacea was estimated in terms of fruit set and fruit size. Further, data on daily and seasonal nectar dynamics of Luffa aegyptiaca were collected. In the early mornings (0600-0700), X. olivacea was the most frequent visitor (0.47 min^-1) on the female flowers compared to A. mellifera (0.13 min^-1). The mean nectar (sugar) concentration in the dry season was 36.58 ± 0.55 %, which was higher than the 34.03 ± 0.38 % obtained for the rainy season (F = 14.986; df = 2; P < 0.0001). Total amount of sugar in the early mornings was 1.88 ± 0.37 mg which was higher than 0.28 ± 0.04 mg in the mid mornings (χ2 = 14.33, df = 1, P < 0.0001). Fruits that developed from flowers that had received a single visit from X. olivacea had a mean weight of 428.7g and were 1.5 times heavier than fruits from flowers visited by A. mellifera (286.76 g). X. olivacea was more efficient than A. mellifera in terms of number of fruit set per single visit. This study has provided some knowledge on pollination ecology of L. aegyptiaca, which can be exploited to improve fruit production in commercially grown vine crops.

References

Abrol DP (2005) Pollination Energetics. Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology 8: 3-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1226-8615(08)60066-7

Bosch J, Retana J, Cerda X (1997) Flowering phenology, floral traits and pollinator composition in a herbaceous Mediterranean plant community. Oecologia 109: 583–591. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050120

Collinson CH (1976) The interrelationships of honey bee activity, foraging behaviour, climatic conditions and foraging in the pollination of pickling cucumbers Cucumis sativus L. PhD thesis: Michigan State University, USA

Corbet SA, Willmer PG, Beament JWL, Unwin DM, Prys-Jones OE (1979) Post-secretory determinants of sugar concentration in nectar. Plant, Cell and Environment 2: 293–300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1979.tb00084.x

Fishbein M, Venable DL (1996) Diversity and temporal change in the effective pollinators of Asclepias tuberosa. Ecology 77:1061–1073. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2265576

Galetto L, Bernardello G (2005) Nectar. In: Dafni A, Kevan PG, Husband BC (eds) Practical Pollination Biology. Enviroquest Ltd, Ontario, Canada, pp 261-313.

Heinrich B (1976) Resource partitioning among some eusocial insects: bumblebees. Science 57: 874–889. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1941054

Kearns CA, Inouye DW (1993) Techniques for pollination biologists. University Press of Colorado Press, Niwot, Colorado, USA

Kudom AA, Kwapong PK (2010) Floral visitors of Ananas comosus in Ghana: a preliminary assessment. Journal of Pollination Ecology 2:27-32 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26786/1920-7603(2010)4

Meléndez RV, Magaña RS, Parra TV, Ayala BR, y Navarro GJ (2002) Diversity of native bee visitor of cucurbit crops (Cucurbitaceae) in Yucatán, México. Journal of Insect Conservation 6 (3): 135-147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023219920798

Mensah BA, Kudom AA (2010) Relating bee activity to pollination of Luffa aegyptiaca Mill. in Ghana. Journal of Apicultural Research and Bee World 42:192-196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3896/IBRA.1.49.2.08

Petanidou T, Ellis WN (1996) Interdependence of native bee faunas and floras in changing Mediterranean communities. The Conservation of Bees. Linnean Society Symposium Series 18 (ed. by A Matheson, SL Buchmann, C O’Toole, P Westrich & IH Williams), pp. 210–226, Academic Press, London, UK.

Potts SG, Dafni A, Ne’eman G (2001) Pollination of a core flowering shrub species in Mediterranean phrygana: variation in pollinator diversity, abundance and effectiveness in response to fire. Oikos 92: 71–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001.920109.x

Potts SG, Vulliamy B, Roberts S, O’ Toole C, Dafni A, Ne’eman G, Willmer P G (2004) Nectar resource diversity organises flower-visitor community structure. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 113: 103–107 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0013-8703.2004.00212.x

Proctor M, Yeo P, Lack A (1996) The Natural History of Pollination. Harper Collins Publishers, London, UK.

Roubik DW (1989) Ecology and Natural History of Tropical Bees. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511574641

Stanghellini MS, Ambrose J, Schultheis JR (1997) The effects of honey bee and bumble bee pollination on the fruit set and abortion of cucumber and water melon. American Bee Journal 137: 386-391.

Stanghellini MS, Ambrose J, Schultheis JR (2002) Diurnal activity, floral visitation and pollen deposition by honey bees and bumble bees on field-grown cucumber and watermelon. Journal of Apicultural Research 41(1-2): 27–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.2002.11101065

Steffan-Dewenter I, Klein, AM, Gaebele V, Alfert T, Tscharntke T (2006) Bee diversity and plant-pollinator interactions in fragmented landscapes. In Waser, NM and Ollerton, J (Eds). Plant-pollinator interactions: From Specialization to Generalization in. Chicago Press; Chicago, USA. pp 387-410.

Thomson JD, Mckenna MA, Cruzan MB (1989) Temporal patterns of nectar and pollen production in Aralia hispida: implications for reproductive success. Ecology 70:1061–1068. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1941375