Floral symmetry affects bumblebee approach consistency in artificial flowers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26786/1920-7603(2016)10Abstract
Bilateral symmetry has evolved from radial symmetry in several floral lineages, and multiple hypotheses have been proposed to account for the success of this floral plan. One of these hypotheses posits that bilateral symmetry (or, more generally, a reduced number of planes of floral symmetry) allows for more precise pollen placement on pollinators. Greater precision would maximize the efficacy of pollen transfer to conspecifics, while minimizing reproductive interference amongst plant species. Despite the intuitiveness of this hypothesis, it has little experimental support. Here, we tested whether a reduction in the number of floral planes of symmetry (as in the transition from radial to bilateral symmetry) increases the potential precision of pollen placement. We analyzed video recordings of bumblebees (Bombus impatiens) visiting artificial flowers to determine whether consistency in flower entry angle differed between radial (round) and disymmetric (rectangular) “flowers”. We observed more consistent entry angles for disymmetric flowers than for radial flowers, with entry angles to radial flowers 43% more variable on average (standard deviations of 30° vs. 21°). Bees trained on flowers with an intermediate (square) morphology exhibited a slight, non-significant preference for radial symmetry over disymmetry. Our results show that disymmetry—an evolutionarily intermediate form of floral symmetry—has the potential to increase pollen transfer to conspecific stigmas, relative to radial symmetry. Thus, evolutionary reduction in the number of planes of floral symmetry likely provides benefits in terms of pollen delivery, as suggested by the pollen-placement-accuracy hypothesis. These findings offer insight into the evolution of floral symmetry.
References
Adler LS, Irwin RE (2006) Comparison of pollen transfer dynamics by multiple floral visitors: Experiments with pollen and fluorescent dye. Annals of Botany 97:141-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcj012
Armbruster WS, Edwards ME, Debevec EM (1994) Floral character displacement generates assemblage structure of Western Australian triggerplants (Stylidium). Ecology 75:315-329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1939537
Armbruster WS, Hansen TF, Pélabon C, Pérez-Barrales R, Maad J (2009) The adaptive accuracy of flowers: measurement and microevolutionary patterns. Annals of Botany 103:1529-1545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcp095
Armbruster WS, Muchhala N (2009) Associations between floral specialization and species diversity: cause, effect, or correlation? Evolutionary Ecology 23:159-179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-008-9259-z
Armbruster WS (2014) Floral specialization and angiosperm diversity: phenotypic divergence, fitness trade-offs and realized pollination accuracy. Annals of Botany Plants 6:1-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plu003
Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67:1-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Citerne H, Jabbour F, Nadot S, Damerval C (2010). The evolution of floral symmetry. Advances in Botanical Research 54:85-137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2296(10)54003-5
Damerval C, Nadot S (2007) Evolution of perianth and stamen characteristics with respect to floral symmetry in Ranunculales. Annals of Botany 100:631-640. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcm041
Damerval C, Citerne H, Le Guilloux M, Domenichini S, Dutheil J, Ronse De Craene L, Nadot S (2013) Asymmetric morphogenetic cues along the transverse plane: shift from disymmetry to zygomorphy in the flower of Fumarioideae. American Journal of Botany 100:391-402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1200376
Donoghue MJ, Ree RH, Baum DA (1998) Phylogeny and the evolution of flower symmetry in the Asteridae. Trends in Plant Science 3:311-317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1360-1385(98)01278-3
Endress, PK (1999) Symmetry in flowers: diversity and evolution. International Journal of Plant Sciences 160:S3-S23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/314211
Fenster CB, Hassler CL, Dudash MR (1996) Flourescent dye particles are good pollen analogs for hummingbird-pollinated Silene virginica (Caryophyllaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany 75:189-193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/b96-023
Fenster CB, Armbruster WS, Wilson P, Dudash MR, Thomson JD (2004) Pollination syndromes and floral specialization. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 35:375-403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132347
Fenster CB, Armbruster WS, Dudash MR (2009) Specialization of flowers: is floral orientation an overlooked first step? New Phytologist 183:502-506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02852.x
Free JB (1970) Effect of flower shapes and nectar guides on the behaviour of foraging honeybees. Behaviour 37:269-285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156853970X00376
Friis EM, Crane PR, Pedersen KR (2011) Patterns of structural diversification in angiosperm reproductive organs. In: Early Flowers and Angiosperm Evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 387-414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511980206.017
Hileman LC (2014) Trends in flower symmetry evolution revealed through phylogenetic and developmental genetic advances. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 369:20130348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0348
Jabbour F, Nadot S, Damerval C (2009) Evolution of floral symmetry: a state of the art. Comptes Rendus Biologies 332:219-231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2008.07.011
Knight TM, Sheets JA, Vamosi JC, Mazer SJ, Burd M, Campbell DR, Dudash MR, Johnston MO, Mitchell RJ, Ashman TL (2005) Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: pattern and process. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 36:467-497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102403.115320
Lázaro A, Hegland SJ, Totland Ø (2008) The relationships between floral traits and specificity of pollination systems in three Scandinavian plant communities. Oecologia 157:249-257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-008-1066-2
Leppik, EE (1953) The ability of insects to distinguish number. American Naturalist 87:229-236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/281778
Leppik EE (1972) Origin and evolution of bilateral symmetry in flowers. Evolutionary Biology 5:49-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0256-9_3
Macior LW (1974) Behavioral aspects of coadaptations between flowers and insect pollinators. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 61:760-769. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2395027
McLernon SM, Murphy SD, Aarssen LW (1996) Heterospecific pollen transfer between sympatric species in a midsuccessional old-field community. American Journal of Botany 83:1168-1174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1996.tb13897.x
Møller AP (1995) Bumblebee preference for symmetrical flowers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 92:2288-2292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.92.6.2288
Møller AP, Eriksson M (1995) Pollinator preference for symmetrical flowers and sexual selection in plants. Oikos 73:15-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3545720
Morales CL, Traveset A (2008) Interspecific pollen transfer: Magnitude, prevalence and consequences for plant fitness. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 27:221-238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680802205631
Muchhala N, Thomson JD (2010) Fur versus feathers: pollen delivery by bats and hummingbirds and consequences for pollen production. American Naturalist 175:717-726. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/652473
Muchhala N, Brown Z, Armbruster WS, Potts MD (2010) Competition drives specialization in pollination systems through costs to male fitness. American Naturalist 176:732-743. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/657049
Muchhala N, Thomson JD (2012) Interspecific competition in pollination systems: costs to male fitness via pollen misplacement. Functional Ecology 26:476-482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2011.01950.x
Neal PR, Dafni A, Giurfa M (1998) Floral symmetry and its role in plant-pollinator systems: Terminology, distribution, and hypotheses. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29:345-373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.345
Ostler WK, Harper KT (1978) Floral ecology in relation to plant species diversity in the Wasatch Mountains of Utah and Idaho. Ecology 59:848-861. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1938788
R Core Team (2014) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL: http://www.R-project.org/
Rodríguez I, Gumbert A, Hempel de Ibarra N, Kunze J, Giurfa M (2004) Symmetry is in the eye of the ‘beeholder’: innate preference for bilateral symmetry in flower-naïve bumblebees. Naturwissenschaften 91:374-377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-004-0537-5
Rudall PJ, Bateman RM (2004) Evolution of zygomorphy in monocot flowers: Iterative patterns and developmental constraints. New Phytologist 162:25-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01032.x
Thomson JD, Ogilvie JE, Makino TT, Arisz A, Raju S, Rojas-Luengas V, Guo Rui Tan M (2012) Estimating pollination success with novel artificial flowers: Effects on nectar concentration. Journal of Pollination Ecology 9:108-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26786/1920-7603(2012)14
Ushimaru A, Hyodo F (2005) Why do bilaterally symmetric flowers orient vertically? Flower orientation influences pollinator landing behaviour. Evolutionary Ecology Research 7:151-160.
Ushimaru A, Dohzono I, Takami Y, Hyodo F (2009) Flower orientation enhances pollen transfer in bilaterally symmetrical flowers. Oecologia 160:667-674. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-009-1334-9
Vamosi JC, Sheets JA, Ashman TL (2013) Drivers of pollen limitation: macroecological interactions between breeding systems, rarity, and diversity. Plant Ecology & Diversity 6:171-180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17550874.2013.769130
Wang Y, Meng LL, Yang YP, Duan YW (2010) Change in floral orientation in Anisodus luridus (Solanaceae) protects pollen grains and facilitates development of fertilized ovules. American Journal of Botany 97:1618-1624. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1000010
Wang H, Tie S, Yu D, Guo YH, Yang CF (2014a) Change of floral orientation within an inflorescence affects pollinator behavior and pollination efficiency in a bee-pollinated plant, Corydalis sheareri. PLoS ONE 9:e95381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095381
Wang H, Xiao CL, Gitruru RW, Xiong Z, Yu D, Guo YH, Yang CF (2014b) Change of floral orientation affects pollinator diversity and their relative importance in an alpine plant with generalized pollination system, Geranium refractum (Geraniaceae). Plant Ecology 215:1211-1219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-014-0379-y
West EL, Laverty TM (1998) Effect of floral symmetry on flower choice and foraging behaviour of bumble bees. Canadian Journal of Zoology 76:730-739. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/z97-246
Wignall AE, Heiling AM, Cheng K, Herberstein ME (2006) Flower symmetry preferences in honeybees and their crab spider predators. Ethology 112:510-518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2006.01199.x
Wolowski M, Ashman TL, Freitas L (2014) Meta-analysis of pollen limitation reveals the relevance of pollination generalization in the Atlantic forest of Brazil. PLoS ONE 9:e89498. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089498
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Brett Matthew Culbert, Jessica Forrest

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



