Aggression between floral specialist bees enhances pollination of Hibiscus (section Trionum: Malvaceae)

Authors

  • Blair Joseph Sampson United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service Thad Cochran Southern Horticultural Laboratory
  • Cecil T Pounders United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service Thad Cochran Southern Horticultural Laboratory
  • Christopher T Werle United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service Thad Cochran Southern Horticultural Laboratory
  • Trevor R Mallette United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service Thad Cochran Southern Horticultural Laboratory

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26786/1920-7603(2016)11

Abstract

Specialist oligoleges are bees with narrow dietary niche breadths often touted to have foraging specializations that enhance their pollination efficiency above that of co-foraging generalists (polyleges) such as honeybees Apis mellifera L. This study and many comparative pollinator efficacy studies in crops show that oligoleges on a per bee basis are not always the most efficient pollinators. Percentage of stigmatic contact visits by populations of oligolectic Ptilothrix bombiformis (Cresson) in Maryland and Mississippi show that adult bees contact stigmas and transfer 70+ pollen grains during 2% - 3% of floral visits. As low as these percentages seem, pollination efficiency of this bee varies from negative values due to the removal of stigmatic pollen during some visits to increases of 30% as Hibiscus petals close and spikes of 300% - 1000% as Ptilothrix adults display aggression inside flowers. Aggressive P. bombiformis tussle with each other, often grappling with, lunging at, and biting conspecifics. Opponents will often lose their balance, tumble around inside flowers and, in the process, more efficiently pollinate host blooms. Such aggressive interactions constituted 5% of visitation bouts to Hibiscus flowers, yet accounted for ~20% of contact visits that transferred 10 or more pollen grains per stigma. Tussles therefore represent brief agonistic entanglements that can enhance the pollination efficiency of solitary bees at host plants with large herkogamous blooms. More complex behavioural interactions between different sexes and species of foraging bees may explain the importance of greater bee diversity to overall pollinator effectiveness.

Author Biographies

Blair Joseph Sampson, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service Thad Cochran Southern Horticultural Laboratory

Research Entomologist

Cecil T Pounders, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service Thad Cochran Southern Horticultural Laboratory

Research Plant Geneticist (retired)

Christopher T Werle, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service Thad Cochran Southern Horticultural Laboratory

Biological Science Technician

References

Baker HG, Hurd PD (1968) Intrafloral ecology. Annual Review of Entomology 13:385-414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.13.010168.002125

Boyadzhiev KN (1999) Spirals and conchospirals in flight of insects. College Math Journal 30:23-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07468342.1999.11974025

Cane JH, Sampson BJ, Miller SA (2011) Pollination value of male bees: the specialist bee Peponapis pruinosa (Apidae) at summer squash (Cucurbita pepo). Environmental Entomology 40:614-620. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1603/EN10084

García D, Zamora R, Gómez JM, Jordano P, Hódar JA (2000) Geographical variation in seed production, predation, and abortion in Juniperus communis throughout its range in Europe. Journal of Ecology 88 436-446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00459.x

Greenleaf SS, Kremen C (2006) Wild bees enhance honeybees’ pollination of hybrid sunflower. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103:13890-13895. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0600929103

Harder LD, Aizen MA (2010) Floral adaptation and diversification under pollen limitation. Philosophical transactions B DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0226

Larsson M (2005) Higher pollinator effectiveness by specialist than generalist flower-visitors of unspecialized Knautia arvensis (Dipsacaceae). Oecologia 146:394-403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0217-y

Liu H, Pemberton RW (2009) Solitary invasive orchid bee outperforms co-occurring native bees to promote fruit set of on invasive Solanum. Oecologia 159:515-525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-008-1232-6

Matsuki,Y, Tateno R, Shibata M, Isagi Y (2008) Pollination efficiencies of flower-visiting insects as determined by direct genetic analysis of pollen origin. American Journal of Botany 95:925-930. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0800036

Nagamitsu T, Inoue T (1997) Aggressive foraging of social bees as a mechanism of floral resource partitioning in an Asian tropical rainforest. Oecologia 110:432-439. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050178

Rust RW (1980) The biology of Ptilothrix bombiformis (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 53:427-436.

Sampson BJ, Cane JH (2000) Pollination efficiencies of three bee (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) species visiting rabbiteye blueberry. Journal of Economic Entomology 93:1726-1731. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-0493-93.6.1726

Sampson BJ, Danka RG, Stringer SJ (2004) Nectar robbery by bees Xylocopa virginica and Apis mellifera contributes to the pollination of rabbiteye blueberry. Journal of Economic Entomology 97:735-740. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/97.3.735

Sampson BJ, Stringer SJ, Marshall DA (2013) Blueberry floral attributes and their effect on the pollination efficiency of an oligolectic bee, Osmia ribifloris Cockerell (Megachilidae: Apoidea). HortScience 48:136-142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.48.2.136

Santa Anna-Aguayo AI, Schaffner CM, Golubov J, Garcia-Franco J, Martínez AJ (2014) Behavioral repertoires and interactions between Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) and the native bee Lithurgus littoralis (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) in flowers of Opuntia huajuapensis (Caryophyllales: Cactaceae) in the Tehuacan Desert. Florida Entomologist manuscript in press.

Sletvold N, Grindeland M, Ågren J (2010) Pollinator-mediated selection on floral display, spur length and flowering phenology in the deceptive orchid Dactylorhiza lapponica. New Phytologist 188:385-392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03296.x

Spira, TP, Snow AA, Whigham DF, Leak J (1992) Flower visitation, pollen deposition, and pollen-tube competition in Hibiscus moscheutos (Malvaceae). American Journal of Botany 79:428-433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1992.tb14570.x

Strickler K (1979) Specialization and foraging efficiencies of solitary bees. Ecology 60:998-1009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1936868

Vásquez DP, Aizen MA (2004) Asymmetric specialization: a pervasive feature of plant-pollinator interactions. Ecology 85:1251-1257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/03-3112

Willmer PG, Finlayson K (2014) Big bees do a better job: interspecific size variation influences pollination effectiveness. Journal of Pollination Ecology 14:244-254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26786/1920-7603(2014)22

Winfree R, Williams NM, Dushoff J, Kremen C (2014) Species abundance, not diet breadth, drives the persistence of the most linked pollinators as plant-pollinator networks Disassemble. American Naturalist 185:600-611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/675716

Wise DA, Menzel MY (1971) Genetic affinities of the North American species of Hibiscus Sect. Trionum. Brittonia 23:425-437 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2805708

Two Ptilothrix females in Hibiscus flower

Downloads

Published

2016-02-18

How to Cite

Sampson, B. J., Pounders, C. T., Werle, C. T., & Mallette, T. R. (2016). Aggression between floral specialist bees enhances pollination of Hibiscus (section Trionum: Malvaceae). Journal of Pollination Ecology, 18, 7–12. https://doi.org/10.26786/1920-7603(2016)11

Issue

Section

Articles