Floral longevity, nectar production, pollen release, and stigma receptivity in Haskap (Lonicera caerulea)

Sandra Danae Frier; Christopher M. Somers; Cory S. Sheffield

doi:10.26786/1920-7603(2016)5

Authors

Sandra Danae Frier University of Regina, Regina, SK Royal Saskatchewan Museum, Regina, SK
Christopher M. Somers University of Regina, Regina, SK
Cory S. Sheffield Royal Saskatchewan Museum, Regina, SK

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26786/1920-7603(2016)5

Abstract

Haskap (Lonicera caerulea L.) is a temperate fruiting shrub grown commercially in northern regions of Europe, Asia, and North America. Haskap is self-incompatible and requires insect pollinators in order to set fruit; however, very little is currently known about its floral biology or pollinator specializations, particularly in North American cultivars. Here, we examine floral longevity, nectar dynamics, the timing of anther dehiscence, and stigma receptivity in flowers of greenhouse-grown ‘Tundra’, a Haskap cultivar developed and grown in Saskatchewan, Canada. Anthesis lasted 83.3 ± 25.9 hours (mean ± SD) in un-pollinated flowers; pollination caused early senescence within 34.3 ± 15.2 hours after pollination. Nectar was present from the onset of anthesis, and nectar volume peaked at 9-16 hours after opening. Nectar volume was maintained throughout anthesis and was not resorbed prior to abscission of the corolla from the ovary, and nectar removed during anthesis was replenished to the original volume. The stigma showed a reaction to hydrogen peroxide while still in the bud stage, suggesting it is receptive even before the flower opens. Early stigma receptivity, nectar production, and anther dehiscence maximize opportunities to be successfully pollinated, along with high floral longevity and pollination-triggered senescence. These results suggest that Haskap flowers utilize a generalist, rather than a specialized, pollination strategy. Observations that some flowers open in the evening or were already open in the morning suggest that nocturnal pollinators such as moths may be important, in addition to known diurnal pollinators.

Author Biography

Sandra Danae Frier, University of Regina, Regina, SK Royal Saskatchewan Museum, Regina, SK

Haskap (Lonicera caerulea L.) is a temperate fruiting shrub grown commercially in northern regions of Europe, Asia, and North America. Haskap is self-incompatible and requires insect pollinators in order to set fruit, however, very little is currently known about its floral biology or pollinator specializations, particularly in North American cultivars. Here, we examine floral longevity, nectar dynamics, the timing of pollen release, and stigma receptivity in flowers of greenhouse-grown ‘Tundra’, a Haskap cultivar developed and grown in Saskatchewan, Canada. Anthesis lasted 83.34± 25.9 hours (mean ± SD) in un-pollinated flowers; pollination caused early senescence within 34.29 ± 15.17 hours after pollination. Nectar was present from the very start of anthesis, and nectar volume peaked at 16 hours after opening. Nectar volume was maintained throughout anthesis and was not resorbed prior to abscission of the corolla from the ovary, and nectar removed during anthesis was replenished to the original volume. The stigma showed a reaction to hydrogen peroxide while still in the bud stage, suggesting it is receptive even before the flower opens.These results suggest that Haskap flowers utilize a generalist, rather than a specialized, pollination strategy. Early stigma receptivity, nectar production, and pollen release maximize opportunities to be successfully pollinated, along with high floral longevity and pollination-triggered senescence. Observations that some flowers open in the evening (and possibly overnight) suggest that nocturnal pollinators such as moths may be important, in addition to known diurnal pollinators.

References

Ackermann M, Weigend M (2006) Nectar, floral morphology and pollination syndrome in Loasaceae subfam. Loasoideae (Cornales). Annals of Botany 98:503-514. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcl136 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcl136

Agostini K, Sazima M, Galetto L (2011) Nectar production dynamics and sugar composition in two Mucuna species (Leguminosae, Faboideae) with different specialized pollinators. Die Naturwissenschaften 98:933-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-011-0844-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-011-0844-6

Amorim FW, Galetto L, Sazima M (2013) Beyond the pollination syndrome : nectar ecology and the role of diurnal and nocturnal pollinators in the reproductive success of Inga sessilis (Fabaceae). Plant Biology 15:317-327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.2012.00643.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.2012.00643.x

Armbruster WS (2012) Evolution and ecological implications of "specialized" pollinator rewards. In: Patiny S (ed) Evolution of Plant-Pollinator Relationships. Cambridge University Press, pp 44-67. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139014113.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139014113.004

Barrett SCH (2002) Sexual interference of the floral kind. Heredity 88:154-159. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6800020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6800020

Bertin RI, Sullivan M (1988) Pollen interference and cryptic self-fertility in Campsis radicans. American Journal of Botany 75:1140-1147. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1988.tb08827.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1988.tb08827.x

Biernaskie JM, Cartar R V, Hurly TA (2002) Risk-averse inflorescence departure in hummingbirds and bumble bees: could plants benefit from variable nectar volumes? Oikos 98:98-104. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.980110.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.980110.x

Biernaskie JM, Cartar RV (2004) Variation in rate of nectar production depends on floral display size: a pollinator manipulation hypothesis. Functional Ecology 18:125-129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2004.00815.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2004.00815.x

Bors B (2008) Growing Haskap in Canada. University of Saskatchewan Fruit Program

Bożek M (2007) Pollen productivity and morphology of pollen grains in two cultivars of honeyberry (Lonicera kamtschatica (Sevast.) Pojark.). Acta Agrobotanica 60:73-77. https://doi.org/10.5586/aa.2007.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5586/aa.2007.008

Bozek M (2012) The effect of pollinating insects on fruiting of two cultivars of Lonicera caerulea L . Journal of Apicultural Science 56:5-11. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10289-012-0018-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10289-012-0018-6

Bożek M, Wieniarska J (2006) Biologia kwitnienia i wydajność cukrowa kwiatów dwóch odmian Lonicera kamtschatica (Sevast.) Pojark / Blooming biology and sugar efficiency of two cultivars of Lonicera kamtschatica (Sevast.) Pojark. Acta Agrobotanica 59:177-182. https://doi.org/10.5586/aa.2006.018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5586/aa.2006.018

Broyles S, Wyatt R (1993) The consequences of self-pollination in Asclepias exaltata, a self-incompatible milkweed. American Journal of Botany 80:41-44. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1993.tb13765.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1993.tb13765.x

Burquez A, Corbet SA (1991) Do flowers reabsorb nectar? Functional Ecology 5:369-379. https://doi.org/10.2307/2389808 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2389808

Dafni A, Kevan PG, Husband BC (2005) Practical Pollination Biology. Enviroquest Ltd., Cambridge, Ontario.

Dafni A, Maues MM (1998) A rapid and simple procedure to determine stigma receptivity. Sexual Plant Reproduction 11:177-180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004970050138 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004970050138

Fenster C, Armbruster W (2004) Pollination syndromes and floral specialization. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35:375-403. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132347 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132347

Freitas L, Sazima M (2006) Pollination biology in a tropical high-altitude grassland in Brazil: interactions at the community level. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 93:465-516. https://doi.org/10.3417/0026-6493(2007)93[465:PBIATH]2.0.CO;2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3417/0026-6493(2007)93[465:PBIATH]2.0.CO;2

Frier SD, Somers CM, Sheffield CS (2016) Comparing the performance of native and managed pollinators of Haskap (Lonicera caerulea: Caprifoliaceae), an emerging fruit crop. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 219:42-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.12.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.12.011

Galen C, Gregory T, Galloway L (1989) Costs of self-pollination in a self-incompatible plant, Polemonium viscosum. American Journal of Botany 76:1675-1680. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1989.tb15152.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1989.tb15152.x

Galetto L, Bernardello G (1996) Characteristics of nectar secretion by Lycium cestroides, L. ciliatum (Solanaceae), and their hybrid. Plant Species Biology 11:157-163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-1984.1996.tb00141.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-1984.1996.tb00141.x

Galetto L, Bernardello G, Rivera GL (1997) Nectar, nectaries, flower visitors, and breeding system in five terrestrial Orchidaceae from central Argentina. Journal of Plant Research 110:393-403. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02506798 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02506798

Galetto L, Bernardello L (1993) Nectar secretion pattern and removal effects in three species of Solanaceae. Canadian Journal of Botany 71:1394-1398. https://doi.org/10.1139/b93-167 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/b93-167

Johnson SD, Nicolson SW (2008) Evolutionary associations between nectar properties and specificity in bird pollination systems. Biology letters 4:49-52. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2007.0496 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2007.0496

Kulloli SK, Chandore AN, Aitawade MM (2011) Nectar dynamics and pollination studies in three species of Lamiaceae. Current Science 100:509-516.

Luyt R, Johnson S (2002) Postpollination nectar reabsorption and its implications for fruit quality in an epiphytic orchid. Biotropica 34:442-446. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2002.tb00558.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2002.tb00558.x

Miyake T, Yahara T (1998) Why does the flower of Lonicera japonica open at dusk? Canadian Journal of Botany 76:1806-1811. https://doi.org/10.1139/b98-119 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/b98-119

Nepi M, Guarnieri M, Pacini E (2001) Nectar secretion , reabsorption , and sugar composition in male and female flowers of Cucurbita pepo. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162:353-358. https://doi.org/10.1086/319581 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/319581

Ollerton J, Alarcón R, Waser NM, Price M V., Watts S, Cranmer L, Hingston A, Peter CI, Rotenberry J (2009) A global test of the pollination syndrome hypothesis. Annals of Botany 103:1471-1480. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcp031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcp031

Ollerton J, Watts S (2000) Phenotype space and floral typology: towards an objective assessment of pollination syndromes. Det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi. I. Matematisk Naturvidenskaplige Klasse, Skrifter, Ny Serie 39:149-159.

Petanidou T, Kallimanis AS, Tzanopoulos J, Sgardelis SP, Pantis JD (2008) Long-term observation of a pollination network: Fluctuation in species and interactions, relative invariance of network structure and implications for estimates of specialization. Ecology Letters 11:564-575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01170.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01170.x

Proctor M (1996) The Natural History of Pollination. Whitecap Books.

R Core Team (2014) R: A language and environment for statistical computing.

Svarcova I, Heinrich J, Valentova K (2007) Berry fruits as a source of biologically active compounds: the case of Lonicera caerulea. Biomedical Papers 151:163-174. https://doi.org/10.5507/bp.2007.031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5507/bp.2007.031

Waser N, Price M (1991) Reproductive costs of self-pollination in Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaeae): are ovules usurped? American Journal of Botany 78:1036-1043. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1991.tb14511.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1991.tb14511.x

Waser NM, Chittka L, Price M V., Williams NM, Ollerton J (1996) Generalization in pollination systems, and why it matters. Ecology 77:1043-1060. https://doi.org/10.2307/2265575 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2265575

Witt T, Geyer R, Gottsberçjer G (1999) Nectar dynamics and sugar composition in flowers of Silene and Saponaria species (Caryophyllaceae). Plant Biology 1:334-345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.1999.tb00261.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.1999.tb00261.x

Wolff D, Witt T, Ju A, Gottsberger G (2006) Nectar dynamics and reproductive success in Saponaria officinalis (Caryophyllaceae) in southern Germany. Flora 201:353-364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2005.07.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2005.07.010

Young HJ (1988) Differential importance of beetle species pollinating Dieffenbachia longispatha (Araceae). Ecology 69:832-844. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1941033