A preliminary early-season flower-visitation web for the Kirindy Forest, Madagascar

Nickolas Waser; Mary Price

doi:10.26786/1920-7603(2010)1

Authors

Nickolas Waser
Mary Price

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26786/1920-7603(2010)1

Keywords:

Connectance, Forest, Generalisation, Nestedness, Pollination, Tropical

Abstract

Tropical dry deciduous forest is an endangered ecosystem whose plant-pollinator relationships are little known. We characterised a portion of the web of interactions between flowering plants and flower visitors in the Kirindy Forest of the Menabe region of west-central Madagascar. Taking a plant-centered approach, we observed individuals of the 5 most abundant native plant species that were coming into flower at the end of the annual dry season, and recorded all identifiable flower-visitors. Taking a visitor-centered approach, we walked a network of established trails and listened for distinctive calls of a common flower-visiting bird, noting the plant species visited. The former approach revealed connections among the early-flowering species via birds and insects, whereas the latter confirmed these connections and added an additional plant species. Flowers of the 6 plant species were visited on average by 5.5 animal species, while 10 visitor species for which we had reasonable samples frequented on average the flowers of 3.3 plant species. These qualitative results resemble those reported from other temperate and tropical webs, in that interactions appeared to be relatively generalised by pollinator species and body plan (e.g., birds vs. bees). Also in agreement, the visitation web was significantly nested, with more-specialised species tending to interact with mutualistic partners that were themselves more generalised. In addition to documenting previously-unreported interactions, therefore, this preliminary web conforms to more widespread patterns emerging for pollination systems at the community level.

References

Alarcón R (2009) Congruence between visitation and pollen-transport networks in a California plant–pollinator community. Oikos 119:35-44 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17694.x

Alarcón R, Waser NM, Ollerton J (2008) Annual variation in the topology of a plant-pollinator interaction network. Oikos 117:1796-1807 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2008.16987.x

Bascompte J, Jordano P, Melián CJ, Olesen JM (2003) The nested assembly of plant-animal mutualistic networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 100:9383–9387 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1633576100

Brooks RW, Michener CD (1988) The Apidae of Madagascar and nests of Liotrigona (Hymenoptera). Sociobiology 14:299-323

Chittka L, Thomson JD, Waser NM (1999) Flower constancy, insect psychology, and plant evolution. Naturwissenschaften 86:361-377 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001140050636

Clements RE, Long FL (1923) Experimental pollination: An outline of the ecology of flowers and insects. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, DC. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.20274

Dufils J-M (2003) Remaining forest cover. In: Goodman SM, Benstead JP (eds) The natural history of Madagascar. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 88-96

Guimarães PR, Guimarães P (2006) Improving the analyses of nestedness for large sets of matrices. Environmental Modelling & Software 21:1512-1513 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2006.04.002

Jordano P (1987) Patterns of mutualistic interactions in pollination and seed dispersal–connectance, dependence asymmetries, and coevolution. American Naturalist 129:657–677 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/284665

Jordano P, Bascompte J, Olesen JM (2003) Invariant properties in coevolutionary networks of plant-animal interactions. Ecology Letters 6:69–81 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00403.x

Kaiser-Bunbury CN, Memmott J, Müller CB (2009) Community structure of pollination webs of Mauritian heathland habitats. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 11:241-254 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees.2009.04.001

Langrand O (1990) Guide to the birds of Madagascar. Yale University Press, New Haven

Lewinsohn TM, Prado PI, Jordano P, Bascompte J, Olesen JM (2006) Structure in plant-animal interaction assemblages. Oikos 113:174-184 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2006.14583.x

Medan D, Basilio AM, Devoto M, Bartoloni NJ, Torretta JP, Petanidou T (2006) Measuring generalization and connectance in temperate, year-long active systems. In: Waser NM, Ollerton J (eds) Plant-pollinator interactions: From specialization to generalization. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 245–259

Memmott J (1999) The structure of a plantpollinator food web. Ecology Letters 2:276–280 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.1999.00087.x

Moldenke AR (1975) Niche specialization and species diversity along a California transect. Oecologia 21:219-242 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00020263

Nielsen A, Bascompte J (2007) Ecological networks, nestedness and sampling effort. Journal of Ecology 95:1134-1141 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01271.x

Petanidou T, Ellis WN (1996) Interdependence of native bee faunas and floras in changing Mediterranean communities. In: Matheson A, Buchmann SJ, O'Toole C, Westrich P, Williams IH (eds) The conservation of bees. Academic Press, London, pp 201–226

Petanidou T, Kallimanis AS, Tzanopoulos J, Sgardelis SP, Pantis JD (2008) Long-term observation of a pollination network: Fluctuation in species and interactions, relative invariance of network structure and implications for estimates of specialization. Ecology Letters 11:564-575 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01170.x

Pyke GH (1984) Optimal foraging theory: A critical review. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 15:523-575 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.15.110184.002515

Ratsirarson J, Silander JA Jr (2003) Pollination ecology of plant communities in the dry forests of the southwest. In: Goodman SM, Benstead JP (eds) The natural history of Madagascar. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 272-275

Robertson C (1929) Flowers and insects: Lists of visitors to four hundred and fiftythree flowers. C Robertson, Carlinville. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.11538

Sazima, M, Buzato S, Sazima I (1999) Bat-pollinated flower assemblages and bat visitors at two Atlantic forest sites in Brazil. Annals of Botany 83:705-712 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1999.0876

Stang, M, Klinkhamer P, Waser N, van der Meijden E (2007). Both constraints and abundance are needed to explain the topology of mutualistic networks. PLoS Biology http://biology.plosjournals.org/perlserv?request=read-response & doi=10.1371/journal.pbio.0050031#r1695>

Stiles FG (1981) Geographical aspects of bird-flower coevolution, with particular reference to Central America. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 68:323-351 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2398801

Vázquez DP, Blüthgen N, Cagnolo L, Chacoff NP (2009) Uniting pattern and process in plant-animal mutualistic networks: A review. Annals of Botany 103:1445-1457 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcp057

Waser NM, Chittka L, Price MV, Williams N, Ollerton J (1996) Generalization in pollination systems, and why it matters. Ecology 77:1043-1060 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2265575