The behaviour of Bombus impatiens (Apidae, Bombini) on tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill., Solanaceae) flowers: pollination and reward perception
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26786/1920-7603(2013)3Abstract
The foraging behaviour of pollinators can influence their efficiency in pollinating certain plant species. Improving our understanding of this behaviour can contribute to an improvement of management techniques to avoid pollination deficits. We investigated the relationship between the number of visits of bumble bees (Bombus impatiens) to tomato flowers (Lycopersicon esculentum) and two variables related to the quality of the resulting fruits (weight, number of seeds), as well as the relationship between foragers’ thoracic weights, physical characteristics of thoracic vibrations (main frequency, velocity amplitude), amount of pollen removed from flowers, and the quality-related variables. In addition, we studied the capability of foragers to assess the availability of pollen in flowers. Tomato weight and seed number did not increase with the number of bee visits, neither were they correlated with the foragers’ thorax weight. Thorax weight also did not correlate with the amount of pollen removed from the flowers nor with the physical characteristics of vibration. Vibration characteristics did not change in response to the amount of pollen available on tomato flowers. Instead, foragers adjusted the time spent visiting the flowers, spending fewer time on flowers from which some pollen had already been removed on previous visits. The quantity and the production-related variables of tomatoes are not dependent on the number of bee visits (usually one visit suffices for full pollination); bigger foragers are not more efficient in pollinating tomato flowers than smaller ones; and B. impatiens foragers are capable of evaluating the amount of pollen on a flower while foraging and during pollination.
References
Banda HJ, Paxton RJ (1991) Pollination of greenhouse tomatoes by bees. Acta Horticulturae 288:194-198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1991.288.28
Buchmann SL (1983) Buzz pollination in angiosperms. In: Jones CE, Little RJ (eds) Handbook of Experimental Pollination Biology. Scientific and Academic Editions, New York, Van Nostrand Reinhold, pp 73-113.
Buchmann SL, Cane JH (1989) Bees assess pollen returns while sonicating Solanum flowers. Oecologia 81:289-294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377073
Buchmann SL, Hurley JP (1978) A biophysical model for buzz pollination in angiosperms. Journal of Theoretical Biology 72:639-657. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(78)90277-1
Buchmann SL, Jones CE, Colin LJ (1977) Vibratile pollination of Solanum douglasii and Solanumxantii (Solanaceae) in Southern California. The Wasmann Journal Biology 35:1-25.
Choi YH, Kang NJ, Park KS, Chun H, Cho MW, Um, YC,You HY (2009) Influence of fruiting methods on fruit characteristics in cherry tomato. Korean Journal of Horticultural Science & Technology 27(1):62-66.
Couvillon MJ, Jandt JM, Duong N, Dornhaus A (2010) Ontogeny of worker body size distribution in bumble bee (Bombus impatiens) colonies. Ecological Entomology 35:424-435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.2010.01198.x
De Luca PA, Bussière LF, Souto-Vilaros D, Goulson D, Mason AC, Vallejo-Marin M (2012) Variability in bumblebee pollination buzzes affects the quantity of pollen released from flowers. Oecologia doi: 10.1007/s00442-012-2535-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-012-2535-1
Dogterom MH, Matteoni JA, Plowright RC (1998) Pollination of greenhouse tomatoes by the North American Bombus vosnesenski (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 91(1):71-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/91.1.71
Goulson D, Stout JC, Langley J, Hughes WHO (2000) Identity and function of scent marks deposited by foraging bumblebees. Journal of Chemical Ecology 26(12):2897-2911. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026406330348
Harder LD (1990) Behavioral responses by bumble bees to variation in pollen availability. Oecologia 94:244-246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317341
Hodges CM, Miller RB (1981) Pollinator flight directionality and the assessment of pollen returns. Oecologia 50:376-379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00344979
Hogendoorn K, Bartholomaeus F, Keller MA (2010) Chemical and sensory comparison of tomatoes pollinated by bees and by a pollination wand. Journal of Economic Entomology 103(4):1286-1292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1603/EC09393
Hrncir M, Jarau S, Zucchi R, Barth FG (2004) Thorax vibrations of a stingless bee (Melipona seminigra). I. No influence of visual flow. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 190:539-548. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-004-0514-7
Hrncir M, Gravel AI, Schorkopf DLP, Schmidt VM, Zucchi R, Barth FG (2008) Thoracic vibrations in stingless bees (Melipona seminigra): resonances of the thorax influence vibrations associated with flight but not those associated with sound production. Journal of Experimental Biology 211:678-685. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.013920
Kevan PG, Straver WA, Offer M, Laverty TM (1991) Pollination of greenhouse tomatoes by bumble bees in Ontario. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Ontario 122:15-19.
King MJ, Buchmann SL (1995) Bumble bee-initiated vibration release mechanism of Rhododendron pollen. American Journal of Botany 82(11):1407-1411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1995.tb12677.x
King MJ, Buchmann SL (1996) Sonication dispensing of pollen from Solanum laciniatum flowers. Functional Ecology 10:449-456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2389937
Lefebvre D, Pierre J (2006) Spatial distribution of bumblebees foraging on two cultivars of tomato in a commercial greenhouse. Journal of Economic Entomology 99:1571–1578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/99.5.1571
McIver SB (1975) Structure of cuticular mechanoreceptors of arthropods. Annual Review of Entomology 20:381-397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.20.010175.002121
McGregor SE (1976) Insect pollination of cultivated crop plants. USDA, Washington, DC.
Morandin LA, Laverty TM, Kevan PG (2001a) Effect of bumble bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) pollination intensity on the quality of greenhouse tomatoes. Journal of Economic Entomology 94(1):172-179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-0493-94.1.172
Morandin LA, Laverty TM, Kevan PG (2001b) Bumble bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) activity and pollination levels in commercial tomato greenhouses. Journal of Economic Entomology 94(2):462-467. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-0493-94.2.462
Morse A (2009) Floral scent and pollination of greenhouse tomatoes. University of Guelph, Guelph.
Morse A, Kevan P, Shipp L, Khosla S, McGarvey B (2012) The impact of greenhouse tomato (Solanales: Solanaceae) floral volatiles on bumble bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) pollination. Environmental Entomology 41(4):855-864. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1603/EN11234
Morse PM (1981) Vibration and Sound. American Institute of Physics of the Acoustical Society of America, New York.
Palma G, Quezada-Euán JJG, Reyes-Oregel V, Meléndez V, Moo-Valle H (2008) Production of greenhouse tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum) using Nannotrigona perilampoides, Bombus impatiens and mechanical vibration (Hym.: Apoidea). Journal of Applied Entomology 132:79–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.2007.01246.x
Rick CM, Dempsey WH (1969) Position of the stigma in relation to fruit setting of the tomato. Botanical Gazette 130(3):180-186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/336488
Rick CM, Robinson J (1951) Inherited defects of floral structure affecting fruitfulness in Lycopersicon esculentum. American Journal of Botany 38(8):639-652. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1951.tb14871.x
Shelly T.E., Villalobos E. & OTS-USAP (2000) Buzzing bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae, Halictidae) on Solanum (Solanaceae): floral choice and handling time track pollen availability. Florida Entomologist 83(2):180-187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3496153
Stout JC, Goulson D, Allen JA (1998) Repellent scent-marking of owers by a guild of foraging bumblebees (Bombus spp.). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 43:317-326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650050497
Stout JC, Goulson D (2001) The use of conspecific and interspecific scent marks by foraging bumblebees and honeybees. Animal Behaviour 62:183-189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2001.1729
Torres-Ruiz A, Jones RW (2000) Comparison of the efficiency of the bumble bees Bombus impatiens and Bombus ephippiatus (Hymenoptera: Apidae) as pollinators of tomato in greenhouses. Journal of Economic Entomology 105(6):1871-1877. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1603/EC12171
Vaissière BE, Freitas BM, Gemmill-Herren B (2011) Protocol to detect and assess pollination deficits in crops: a handbook for its use. FAO, Rome.
Velthuis HHW, Van Doorn A (2006) A century of advances in bumblebee domestication and the economic and environmental aspects of its commercialization for pollination. Apidologie, 37:421-451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/apido:2006019
Whittington R, Winston ML (2004) Comparison and examination of Bombus occidentalis and Bombus impatiens (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in tomato greenhouses. Journal of Economic Entomology 97(4):1384-1389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/97.4.1384
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2013 Patrícia Nunes-Silva, Michael Hrncir, Les Shipp, Peter Kevan, Vera Lucia Imperatriz-Fonseca
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
