Managed honeybees affect the foraging behaviour of bumblebees in Geranium sylvaticum

Jaakko Soininen; Juho Paukkunen; Minna-Maarit Kytöviita

doi:10.26786/1920-7603(2025)853

Authors

Jaakko Soininen Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Mathematics and Science, University of Jyväskylä https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7214-1572
Juho Paukkunen Finnish Museum of Natural History Luomus, University of Helsinki
Minna-Maarit Kytöviita Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Mathematics and Science, University of Jyväskylä https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8928-6951

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26786/1920-7603(2025)853

Keywords:

Apis mellifera, floral resource competition, genetic variation, sexual dimorphism

Abstract

Due to shared evolutionary history, native pollinator diversity and coexistence is promoted by niche partitioning and behavioural differences between species. Introduced insect species, however, have potential to compete with wild pollinators and negatively affect native insect populations. Honeybee (Apis mellifera) is an introduced pollinator species in northern Europe and may affect native pollinator populations negatively. Diversity in plant communities also promotes variation in the associated pollinator communities. Diversity of a community encompasses not only species diversity but includes within species variation as well. Within species, genetic diversity could promote insect coexistence and affect competitive interactions between pollinator insects.

In this study, we measured floral visitation rates in female and hermaphrodite Geranium sylvaticum genotypes in the presence and absence of a beehive (Apis mellifera) in an experimental field located in Central Finland. We show that competition with honeybees reduced visitation rates by bumblebees, but not by other native pollinator groups. Furthermore, bumblebees preferred some plant genotypes in the absence of the honeybees, but not in the presence of honeybees. Overall, bumblebees preferred females over hermaphrodite plants, but honeybees showed no such preference. Our study links the native pollinators and genetically diverse plant populations, and sheds light on the competition between pollinator insects.

References

Alcorn K, Whitney H, Glover B (2012) Flower movement increases pollinator preference for flowers with better grip. Functional Ecology 26:941–947. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2012.02009.x

Asikainen E, Mutikainen P (2005) Preferences of Pollinators and Herbivores in Gynodioecious Geranium sylvaticum. Annals of Botany 95:879–886. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci094

Balfour NJ, Garbuzov M, Ratnieks FLW (2013) Longer tongues and swifter handling: why do more bumble bees (Bombus spp.) than honey bees (Apis mellifera) forage on lavender (Lavandula spp.)? Ecological Entomology 38:323–329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/een.12019

Beekman M, Ratnieks FLW (2000) Long-range foraging by the honey-bee, Apis mellifera L.: Honey-bee foraging. Functional Ecology 14:490–496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2435.2000.00443.x

Bond WJ, Maze KE (1999) Survival costs and reproductive benefits of floral display in sexually dimorphic dioecious shrub, Leucadendron xanthoconus. Evolutionary Ecology 13:1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006581412580

Brian AD (1957) Differences in the Flowers Visited by Four Species of Bumble-Bees and their Causes. Journal of Animal Ecology 26:71–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1782

Burkle LA, Souza L, Genung MA, Crutsinger GM (2013) Plant genotype, nutrients, and G × E interactions structure floral visitor communities. Ecosphere 4, art113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/ES13-00039.1

Cappellari A, Bonaldi G, Mei M, Paniccia D, Cerretti P, Marini L (2022) Functional traits of plants and pollinators explain resource overlap between honeybees and wild pollinators. Oecologia 198:1019–1029. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-022-05151-6

Carlsson-Granér U, Elmqvist T, Ågren J, Gardfjell H, Ingvarsson B (1998) Floral sex ratios, disease and seed set in dioecious Silene dioica. Journal of Ecology 86:79–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.1998.00231.x

Cooley AM, Carvallo G, Willis JH (2008) Is Floral Diversification Associated with Pollinator Divergence? Flower Shape, Flower Colour and Pollinator Preference in Chilean Mimulus. Annals of Botany 101:641–650. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcn014

Crane E. (1999) The World History of Beekeeping and Honey Hunting. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203819937

Elliott B, Wilson R, Shapcott A, Keller A, Newis R, Cannizzaro C, Burwell C, Smith T, Leonhardt SD, Kämper W, Wallace HM (2021) Pollen diets and niche overlap of honey bees and native bees in protected areas. Basic Applied Ecology 50:169–180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2020.12.002

Feinsinger P, Spears EE, Poole RW (1981) A Simple Measure of Niche Breadth. Ecology 62:27–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1936664

Fontaine C, Collin CL, Dajoz I (2008) Generalist foraging of pollinators: diet expansion at high density: Flexibility of pollinator generalization. Journal of Ecology 96:1002–1010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01405.x

Fürst MA, McMahon DP, Osborne JL, Paxton RJ, Brown MJF (2014) Disease associations between honeybees and bumblebees as a threat to wild pollinators. Nature 506:364–366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12977

Goulson D (2003) Effects of Introduced Bees on Native Ecosystems. The Annual Review of Ecology 34:1–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132355

Goulson D, Darvill B (2004) Niche overlap and diet breadth in bumblebees; are rare species more specialized in their choice of flowers? Apidologie 35:55–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/apido:2003062

Goulson D, Sparrow KR (2009) Evidence for competition between honeybees and bumblebees; effects on bumblebee worker size. Journal of Insect Conservation 13:177–181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-008-9140-y

Greenleaf SS, Kremen C (2006) Wild bees enhance honey bees’ pollination of hybrid sunflower. Proceedings of the national Academy of Science U.S.A 103:13890–13895. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0600929103

Hajjar R, Jarvis DI, Gemmill-Herren B (2008) The utility of crop genetic diversity in maintaining ecosystem services. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 123:261–270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2007.08.003

Hallmann CA, Sorg M, Jongejans E, Siepel H, Hofland N, Schwan H, Stenmans W, Müller A, Sumser H, Hörren T, Goulson D, Kroon H (2017) More than 75 percent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas. PLoS One 12, e0185809. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185809

Harder LD (1985) Morphology as a Predictor of Flower Choice by Bumble Bees. Ecology 66:198–210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1941320

Heinrich B (1976) Resource Partitioning Among Some Eusocial Insects: Bumblebees. Ecology 57:874–889. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1941054

Henry M, Rodet G (2018) Controlling the impact of the managed honeybee on wild bees in protected areas. Scientific Reports 8:9308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27591-y

Hietaranta E, Juottonen H, Kytöviita M-M (2023) Honeybees affect floral microbiome composition in a central food source for wild pollinators in boreal ecosystems. Oecologia 201:59–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-022-05285-7

Hughes AR, Inouye BD, Johnson MTJ, Underwood N, Vellend M (2008) Ecological consequences of genetic diversity: Ecological effects of genetic diversity. Ecology Letters 11:609–623. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01179.x

Jeavons E, Baaren J van, Le Lann C (2020) Resource partitioning among a pollinator guild: A case study of monospecific flower crops under high honeybee pressure. Acta Oecology 104, 103527. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2020.103527

Klein A, Steffan–Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2003) Fruit set of highland coffee increases with the diversity of pollinating bees. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 270:955–961. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2306

Koupilová K, Štenc J, Janovský Z (2022) Pollinators adjust their behavior to presence of pollinator-transmitted pathogen in plant population. Behavioral Ecology 33:319–328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arab153

Leonhardt SD, Blüthgen N (2012) The same, but different: pollen foraging in honeybee and bumblebee colonies. Apidologie 43: 449–464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-011-0112-y

Lindström SAM, Herbertsson L, Rundlöf M, Bommarco R, Smith HG (2016) Experimental evidence that honeybees depress wild insect densities in a flowering crop. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 283, 20161641. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.1641

Little KJ, Dieringer G, Romano M (2005) Pollination ecology, genetic diversity and selection on nectar spur length in Platanthera lacera (Orchidaceae). Plant Species Biology 20:183–190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-1984.2005.00137.x

MacArthur RH (1958) Population Ecology of Some Warblers of Northeastern Coniferous Forests. Ecology 39:599–619. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1931600

Mallinger RE, Gaines-Day HR, Gratton C (2017) Do managed bees have negative effects on wild bees?: A systematic review of the literature. PLoS One 12, e0189268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189268

Mizunaga Y, Kudo G (2017) A linkage between flowering phenology and fruit-set success of alpine plant communities with reference to the seasonality and pollination effectiveness of bees and flies. Oecologia 185:453–464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-017-3946-9

Montero‐Castaño A, Vilà M (2017) Influence of the honeybee and trait similarity on the effect of a non‐native plant on pollination and network rewiring. Functional ecology 31:142–152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12712

Morales CL, Sáez A, Garibaldi LA, Aizen MA (2017) Disruption of pollination services by invasive pollinator species. Impact of Biological Invasions on Ecosystem Services, Invading Nature – Springer Series in Invasion Ecology 12:203–220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45121-3_13

Nanetti A, Bortolotti L, Cilia G (2021) Pathogens Spillover from Honey Bees to Other Arthropods. Pathogens 10, 1044. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10081044

Nishikawa Y, Shimamura T (2016) Effects of alien invasion by Bombus terrestris L. (Apidae) on the visitation patterns of native bumblebees in coastal plants in northern Japan. Journal of Insect Conservation 20:71–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-015-9841-y

Osborne JL, Clark SJ, Morris RJ, Williams IH, Riley JR, Smith AD, Reynolds DR, Edwards AS (1999) A landscape-scale study of bumble bee foraging range and constancy, using harmonic radar. Journal of Applied Ecology 36: 519–533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.1999.00428.x

Page ML, Williams NM (2023) Honey bee introductions displace native bees and decrease pollination of a native wildflower. Ecology 104(2) e3939. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3939

Paini DR (2004) Impact of the introduced honey bee (Apis mellifera) (Hymenoptera: Apidae) on native bees: A review. Austral Ecology 29:399–407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2004.01376.x

Pascual Tudanca MP, Debandi H, Vázquez, DP (2024) Managed honeybee hives negatively affect the reproduction of native plants in a dryland nature reserve. Journal of Applied Ecology 61(6):1301-1311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.14646

Petanidou T, Van Laere AN, Ellis W, Smets E (2006) What shapes amino acid and sugar composition in Mediterranean floral nectars? Oikos 115:155–169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14487.x

Ramadoss N, Steele S, Flores-Rentería L (2023) Influence of sexual dimorphism and dichromatism on reproductive success in a rare native cactus. Oecologia. 203:383–394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-023-05473-z

Ramos‐Jiliberto R, Moisset De Espanés P, Vázquez DP (2020) Pollinator declines and the stability of plant–pollinator networks. Ecosphere 11, e03069. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3069

Ranta E, Lundberg H (1980) Resource Partitioning in Bumblebees: The Significance of Differences in Proboscis Length. Oikos 35:298–302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3544643

Real LA (1981) Nectar Availability and Bee-Foraging on Ipomoea (Convolvulaceae). Biotropica 13:64–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2388072

Requier F, Abdelli M, Baude M, Genoud D, Gens H, Geslin B, Henry M, Ropars L (2024) Neglecting non-bee pollinators may lead to substantial underestimation of competition risk among pollinators. Current Research in Insect Science 6:100093. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cris.2024.100093

Roubik DW, Moreno JE, Vergara C, Wittmann D (1986) Sporadic food competition with the African honey bee: projected impact on neotropical social bees. Journal of Tropical Ecology 2:97–111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467400000699

Roubik DW, Wolda H (2001) Do competing honey bees matter? Dynamics and abundance of native bees before and after honey bee invasion. Population Ecology 43:53–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00012016

Ruedenauer FA, Spaethe J, Kooi CJ van der, Leonhardt SD (2019) Pollinator or pedigree: which factors determine the evolution of pollen nutrients? Oecologia 191:349–358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-019-04494-x

Sánchez-Bayo F, Wyckhuys KAG (2019) Worldwide decline of the entomofauna: A review of its drivers. Biological conservation 232:8–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.01.020

Scriven JJ, Whitehorn PR, Goulson D, Tinsley Matthew C (2016) Niche partitioning in a sympatric cryptic species complex. Ecology and Evolution 6:1328–1339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1965

Soininen JOS & Kytöviita M-M (2022) Geranium sylvaticum increases pollination probability by sexually dimorphic flowers. Ecology and Evolution 12, e9670. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9670

Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2000) Resource overlap and possible competition between honey bees and wild bees in central Europe. Oecologia 122:288–296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050034

Suomen Mehiläishoitajain Liitto SML ry 2023. Tilastotietoja mehiläisalalta. https://hunaja.net/kysy-meilta/medialle/tilastotietoja-mehilaisalalta/. (27.9.2023)

Taggar AK, McGrath E, Despland E (2021) Competition between a native and introduced pollinator in unmanaged urban meadows. Biological Invasions 23:1697–1705. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-021-02465-z

Thomson D (2004) Competitive interactions between the invasive European honey bee and native bumble bees. Ecology 85:458–470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/02-0626

Thomson DM, Page ML (2020) The importance of competition between insect pollinators in the Anthropocene. Current Opinion in Insect Science 38: 55–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2019.11.001

Valdovinos FS, Brosi BJ, Briggs HM, Moisset De Espanés P, Ramos-Jiliberto R, Martinez ND (2016) Niche partitioning due to adaptive foraging reverses effects of nestedness and connectance on pollination network stability. Ecology Letters 19:1277–1286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12664

Van Etten ML, Chang S-M (2014) Frequency-dependent pollinator discrimination acts against female plants in the gynodioecious Geranium maculatum. Annals of Botany 114:1769–1778. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcu204

Varga S, Kytöviita M-M (2010) Gender dimorphism and mycorrhizal symbiosis affect floral visitors and reproductive output in Geranium sylvaticum (Geraniaceae). Functional Ecology 24:750-758. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01708.x

Varga S, Nuortila C, Kytöviita M-M (2013) Nectar Sugar Production across Floral Phases in the Gynodioecious Protandrous Plant Geranium sylvaticum. PLoS One 8, e62575. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062575

Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern Applied Statistics with S. Springer New York, New York, NY. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2

Wei N, Kaczorowski RL, Arceo-Gómez G, O’Neill EM, Hayes RA, Ashman T-L (2021) Pollinators contribute to the maintenance of flowering plant diversity. Nature 597:688–692. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03890-9

Westerkamp C (1991) Honeybees are poor pollinators - why? Plant Systematics and Evolution 177:71-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00937827

Woodward GL, Laverty TM (1992) Recall of flower handling skills by bumble bees: a test of Darwin’s interference hypothesis. Animal Behaviour 44:1045–1051. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80316-1